Your data. Your infrastructure. Your control.
Connect organisational knowledge, answer with evidence and run approved workflows inside infrastructure you control.
On-premises · private cloud · sovereign region · hosted · multilingual
The Sovereignty Commitments
These four hold in every deployment mode. If any of them stops being true for your configuration, that is a defect — not a setting, and not a tier.
Governance is not a policy beside the AI. Approved knowledge enters through governed scopes, becomes organisational memory, and powers answers and action — with identity, scope, approval, budget and audit applied before anything runs.
Most organisations we meet already have a general assistant somewhere and a search tool in the stack. They each do a real job, and they are not the same category of thing — so it helps to be clear about which job you are trying to fill.
If a general assistant already solves your problem, we will tell you that in the first call. This is worth deploying when the answer has to be defensible, the data cannot leave, or the AI needs to do something rather than say something. See the full comparison →
Automate work with a person in the loop. Ask and get proof. Keep every workspace inside its boundary. Build agents out of skills. Then see what the system is actually doing.
Build the flow. Pause before action. A person decides what runs.
Ask plainly, in any supported language. Get permitted answers with sources you can check.
Organisation, Teamspace and Personal scopes set what people and agents can see and do.
Everyone starts with a personal agent. Teamspaces add as many as they need, and each inherits scope, audit and approval the moment it exists.
What people ask, which sources answer, where the spend goes, and which teams have adopted it.
We do not run six-month discovery. Bring your compliance, risk and technology leads, pick a question your organisation already argues about, and we will show you the governed answer and the evidence behind it.
Upload a folder or connect a knowledge source, set one teamspace boundary, and ask real questions. No admin project, no data migration, no integration work.
You see answers with sources attachedTwo teams, two boundaries. We show a question that returns nothing because it should, and the audit record the denied attempt produced.
Your risk lead sees it fail closedBuild a workflow with a real approval step, run it against real work, and review the audit trail and the spend it consumed against budget.
You decide on evidence, not a demoThirty minutes. We will map one use case, demonstrate scope isolation, and show the audit evidence the platform produces — or tell you plainly that you do not need us yet.