Compare against approved language
Each contract is checked against the clauses legal has already approved, not a general sense of what looks reasonable.
EXPLORE ↘
KognosysSENANGAITalk to us ↗Review with the playbook attached.
Contract review that cites the approved clause it compared against, so counsel sees the reasoning, not just the recommendation.
Explore the page ↓
IGNITE/SPOKES/NODES/INFER/QUERY
01RETRIEVE
02REASON
03VERIFY
GOVERNED MEMORY ACTIVE
Personal · Teamspace · OrganisationIdentity and scope are resolved before people or agents can retrieve knowledge.
Every deviation traced to its source
When a clause departs from the playbook, the system shows which clause it compared against and why the wording differs.
EXPLORE ↘Escalation with the record attached
Drafts that need a human decision go to counsel with the comparison, the variance and the relevant precedent already assembled.
EXPLORE ↘HOW LEGAL REVIEW RUNS
From draft to a decision counsel can stand behind.
The review stays inside the boundary legal has approved, and every recommendation carries its source.
01INTAKE
Contract or clause enters the queue
02COMPARE
Checked against the approved playbook
03FLAG
Variances cited to the clause they depart from
04ROUTE
Counsel reviews with the evidence attached
PLAYBOOKAPPROVED CLAUSE LIBRARY
VARIANCECITED TO SOURCE
COUNSELFULL REVIEW TRAIL
LIVE EVALUATION
One use case.
Three weeks.
Evidence, not theatre.
Bring your compliance, risk and technology leads. Pick a question your organisation already argues about.
Book a working session ↗